While you’ll notice a ridge running down the middle, it’s less obvious than Microsoft’s clear separating bezel. Samsung’s main screen is undoubtedly more of a feat of engineering. These can serve as a single display, but the point is to have clear separation for the Duo’s split-screen functions. While Samsung uses one large foldable 7.6-inch AMOLED screen, and one 6.2-inch AMOLED Cover Display, Microsoft splits its 8.1-inch AMOLED into two distinct halves – hence the Duo name. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 screen (Image credit: Aakash Jhaveri)īoth phones employ two displays, although their implementation is very different. It doesn’t have the Galaxy Z Fold 3’s IPX8 waterproof rating, and its front and rear are coated in Gorilla Glass 5 rather than the Samsung’s superior Gorilla Glass Victus. Microsoft’s foldable tablet is slightly sexier, then, but it isn’t quite as rugged as the Samsung. Samsung’s device can still be used in this ‘closed’ position, but only by implementing a second external display, which feels like an altogether less elegant solution. It won’t open a full 360-degrees in the way of Microsoft’s hinge. Samsung’s third-gen hinge is more of a triumph of iteration, with a rather utilitarian approach. ![]() It’s remarkably solid despite its daintiness, too. Microsoft’s hinge system is also more subtle and pretty, with a minimal gap and an awesome feel. ![]() While the Microsoft Surface Duo still resembles a regular phone at less than 10mm thick, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is about 50% thicker. That thickness really makes all the difference when both devices are folded. It’s also a fair bit heavier at 271g versus 250g. It doesn’t get everything its own way, though.Īt 158.2 x 128.1 x 6.4mm unfurled, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a much squarer and thicker device than the 186.9 x 145.2 x 4.8mm Surface Duo. These are two of the most head-turning smartphones on the market, but in terms of pure design, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 wins out.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |